Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kumar Roy, Bijan
- Digital Access Brokers: Clustering and Comparison (Part I – Locator Services)
Abstract Views :166 |
PDF Views:5
Authors
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, University of Calcutta, Kolkata – 700073, IN
2 Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kalyani, Kolkata – 741245 West Bengal, IN
1 Associate Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, University of Calcutta, Kolkata – 700073, IN
2 Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, University of Kalyani, Kolkata – 741245 West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 59, No 5 (2022), Pagination: 273-284Abstract
Scholarly resources published on different platforms are not often searchable and accessible to potential scholars. Google, like other search engines, does not always retrieve free articles on a consistent basis. As a result, there is a gap between the availability and discoverability of scholarly resources. Digital Access Brokers are ground-breaking developments in this context that assemble, discover, and link to open access copies of paid articles or paywalled papers legally uploaded by authors or author-posted manuscripts, with permission from publishers. Browser extensions have emerged as an alternative retrieval assistant to help scholars locate and provide free full-text access to such content available on different publisher sites, databases, open-access journals, or institutional repositories. Unlike other search engines, these extensions provide additional value-added services (such as recommending related resources, citation information, status, type of open access license, level of access and availability of copies by indicating different colours, integration with citation management tools, article metrics) along with the paper to reduce the information overload of the readers. The objective of this paper is to provide an idea about different browser extensions such as Kopernio, Open Access Button,unpaywall and along with their features that might help them in selecting the best toolfor their research work.Keywords
Browser Extension, Digital Access Broker, Open Access, Open Access Button, Scholarly Communication, Unpaywall
References
- Azadbakht, E. and Schultz, T. (2020). At the click of a but-ton: assessing the user experience of open access finding tools. Information Technology and Libraries, 39(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i2.12041.
- Cook, E. and McArthur, J. (2017). What is open access button? An interview with Joe McArthur. The Serials Librarian, 73(3-4), 208-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/036 1526X.2017.1391152.
- De Sarkar, T. (2015). The prevalence of web browser extensions use in library services: An exploratory study. Electronic Library, 33(3), 334-354. https://doi. org/10.1108/EL-04-2013-0063.
- DeVoe, K. (2007). Innovations affecting us - Browser add-ons, extensions, and plug-ins: How they can help leverage the use of library resources. Against the Grain, 19(5), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.5309.
- Dhakal, K. (2019). Resource Review: Unpaywall. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(2), 286-288. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.650. PMCid:PMC6466485.
- Else, H. (2018). How Unpaywall is transforming open science. Nature, 560(7718), 290-291. http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3. PMid:30111793.
- Ferguson, C. L. (2019). Leaning into Browser Extensions. Serials Review, 45(1-2), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 0987913.2019.1624909.
- Lawrence, A. (2017). What are Google chrome exten-sions? Bleeping computer. www.bleepingcomputer.com/ tutorials/understanding-google-chrome-extensions/
- Norris, M., Oppenheim, C. and Rowland F. (2008). Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR. Online Information Review, 32(6) (2008), 709-715. https://doi. org/10.1108/14684520810923881.
- Rodriguez, M. (2019b). Unpaywall. Technical Services Quarterly, 36(2), 216-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2019.1585002.
- Rodriguez, M. (2019a). Open access button. Technical Services Quarterly, 36(1), 101-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2018.1532043.
- Schultz, T.A. et al. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of open access finding tools. Information Technology and Libraries, 38(3), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital. v38i3.11009.
- Tay, A. (2019). Kopernio, lean library, anywhere access and other ‘Access Broker’ browser extensions-a roundup and update of current state of play. http:// musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.com/2019/05/ kopernio-lean-library-anywhere- access.html.
- Willi Hooper, M. (2017). Unpaywall [Chrome & Firefox browser extension] [Product Review]. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2190.
- WilliHooper, M. (2016). Unpaywall [Chrome & Firefox browser extension] [product review]. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 15(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2190.
- Williamson, P. O. and Mirza, R. (2015). Does Google scholar help or hurt institutional repositories. In: The complete guide to using Google in libraries: Instruction, administration and staff productivity (Ed. C. Smallwood) (211-217). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Digital Access Brokers: Clustering and Comparison (Part II – from Summarization to Citation Map)
Abstract Views :201 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Calcutta, West Bengal, IN
2 Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, IN
1 Associate Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Calcutta, West Bengal, IN
2 Professor, Department of Library Information Science, University of Kalyani, West Bengal, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 59, No 6 (2022), Pagination: 337-351Abstract
In our previous article (Digital Access Brokers: clustering and comparison (Part I - locator services), we covered a total of twelve browser extensions under one broad group viz. Group A- Locations, Citations & References. This paper covers another twenty-two more browser extensions under four major groups viz. Group B- Summarizers, Recommenders & Commenters; Group C- Multi Functional; Group D - Resource Integration; and Group E- Citation Map Builder. All of these tools assist researchers in a variety of ways in obtaining content, both open-access and licenced content owned by various publishers or databases.Keywords
Browser Extension, Digital Access Broker, Google Scholar Button, Kopernio, Lazy Scholar, Lean Library.References
- Ferguson, C. L. (2019). Leaning into browser extensions. Serials Review, 45(1-2), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 0987913.2019.1624909.
- Hoy, M. B. (2019). New tools for finding full-text articles faster: Kopernio, Nomad, Unpaywall, and More. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 38(3), 287-292. https://doi. org/10.1080/02763869.2019.1629215. PMid:31379291.
- Hupe, M. (2020). Lean library. Journal of Medical Library Association, 108(3), 518-519. https://doi.org/10.5195/ jmla.2020.976. PMid:32843883 PMCid:PMC7441912
- Piwowar, H., et al. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. Peer J, 6. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375. PMid:29456894 PMCid:PMC5815332.
- Wang, X., et al. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555-564. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0.https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0.